| Figure 1.1 | Location of the Hanford Site |
| Figure 3.1 | Estimated Recharge Rates at Hanford in 1979 |
| Figure 3.2 | Numerical Model Grid and Boundary Conditions |
| Figure 3.3 | Wells and Aquifer Test Results (Transmissivity in m2/d) Used in the Inverse Calibration |
| Figure 4.1 | Transmissivity Distribution Obtained from Inverse Calibration for 1979 Conditions |
| Figure 4.2 | Comparison of Observed and Predicted Water-Table Conditions for 1979 from the Two-Dimensional Model Using Transmissivities from the Inverse Calibration |
| Figure 4.3 | Hydrogeologic Units Intersecting Water Table for 1979 Conditions |
| Figure 4.4 | Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution in the Uppermost Hydrogeologic Units of the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.5 | Comparison of Observed and Predicted Water-Table Conditions for 1979 Using the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.6 | Difference Between the Observed Water Table and the Water Table Predicted for 1979 with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.7 | Comparison of Water-Table Elevations Measured in Wells and Water-Table Elevations Predicted for 1979 with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.8 | Estimated Annual Effluent Discharges in the 200 Areas Used in the Three-Dimensional Model for Conditions from 1979 to 2026 |
| Figure 4.9 | Comparison of 1996 Observed and Predicted Water Table Conditions Using Specific Yield of 0.1 for the Ringold Formation and 0.25 for the Hanford Formation |
| Figure 4.10 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 1, 2, 3, and 4 from 1979 to 1996 |
| Figure 4.11 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 5, 6, 7, and 8 from 1979 to 1996 |
| Figure 4.12 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 9, 10, 11, and 12 from 1979 to 1996 |
| Figure 4.13 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 13, 14, 15, 16 from 1979 to 1996 |
| Figure 4.14 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 17, 18, 19, and 20 from 1979 to 1996 |
| Figure 4.15 | Locations of Wells Shown in Hydrographs |
| Figure 4.16 | Water-Table Conditions for 2000 Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.17 | Water-Table Conditions for 2100 Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.18 | Water-Table Conditions for 2200 Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.19 | Water-Table Conditions for 2350 Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 4.20 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 1, 2, 3, and 4 from 1996 to 2500 |
| Figure 4.21 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 5, 6, 7, and 8 from 1996 to 2500 |
| Figure 4.22 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 9, 10, 11, and 12 from 1996 to 2500 |
| Figure 4.23 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 13, 14, 15, and 16 from 1996 to 2500 |
| Figure 4.24 | Hydrographs for Selected Wells and Model Nodes in Areas 17, 18, 19, and 20 from 1996 to 2500 |
| Figure 4.25 | Difference Between Hanford Water-Table Conditions Predicted for 2350 and 1996 |
| Figure 4.26 | Comparison of Hanford Water-Table Conditions Predicted for 2350 and Estimated Hanford Water-Table Conditions in 1944 |
| Figure 5.1 | Refined Finite-Element Grid Used for Three-Dimensional Transport Simulations |
| Figure 5.2 | Areal Distribution of Tritium Used as Initial Conditions for Transport Modeling |
| Figure 5.3 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 1985 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.4 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 1996 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.5 | Observed Tritium for 1996 Conditions |
| Figure 5.6 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 2000 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.7 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 2020 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.8 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 2050 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.9 | Areal Distribution of Tritium in 2100 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Transport Model |
| Figure 5.10 | Areal Distribution of Iodine-129 Used as Initial Conditions for Transport Modeling |
| Figure 5.11 | Areal Distribution of Iodine-129 in 2031 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.12 | Areal Distribution of Iodine-129 in 2049 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.13 | Areal Distribution of Iodine-129 in 2099 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.14 | Areal Distribution of Iodine-129 in 2299 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.15 | Areal Distribution of Technetium-99 Used as Initial Conditions for Transport Modeling |
| Figure 5.16 | Areal Distribution of Technetium-99 in 2000 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.17 | Areal Distribution of Technetium-99 in 2031 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.18 | Areal Distribution of Technetium-99 in 2049 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.19 | Areal Distribution of Technetium-99 in 2099 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.20 | Areal Distribution of Uranium Used as Initial Conditions for Transport Modeling |
| Figure 5.21 | Areal Distribution of Uranium in 2031 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.22 | Areal Distribution of Uranium in 2049 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.23 | Areal Distribution of Uranium in 2099 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.24 | Areal Distribution of Uranium in 2299 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.25 | Areal Distribution of Strontium-90 Used as Initial Conditions for Transport Modeling |
| Figure 5.26 | Areal Distribution of Strontium-90 in 2031 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.27 | Areal Distribution of Strontium-90 in 2049 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.28 | Areal Distribution of Strontium-90 in 2099 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 5.29 | Areal Distribution of Strontium-90 in 2299 as Predicted with the Three-Dimensional Model |
| Figure 6.1 | Hanford Site Water-Supply Wells |
| Figure 6.2 | Northwest-to-Southeast Cross Section Through the 400 Area Showing Major Hydrogeologic Units, the Location of Drinking-Water Supply Wells, and Predicted Levels of Tritium for Conditions 1996 and 2000 |
| Figure 6.3 | Northwest-to-Southeast Cross Section Through the 400 Area Showing Major Hydrogeologic Units, the Location of Drinking-Water Supply Wells, and Predicted Levels of Tritium for Conditions 2010 and 2020 |
| Figure 6.4 | Simulated Position of 20,000 pCi/L Tritium Contour for 1996, 2020, and 2030 |
| Figure 6.5 | Simulated Position of 1 pCi/L Iodine-129 Contour for 1996 and 2031 |
